We’ll see.
The transition plan will be Romney’s transition plan, not Mike Leavitt’s. Leavitt’s company has been hired to consult Romney on implementing Romney’s plan.
So, I will wait and reserve judgement regarding that plan until I see what Romney actually proposes and does, as opposed to projecting a plan that fits a pre-conceived notion of what someone expects that the man may do...particularly of that pre-concieved opinion fits a particular individual’s or group’s stated negative agenda about Romney...wther from the liberals or conservaitves who refuse to consider the man.
Perhaps Leavitt’s company is simply very good at organizing and putting together methodlogies and project oriented implementation steps to meet the stated goals and plans of those who hire him...perhaps that is the reason he has been hired.
Until we see what Romney actually proposes and does, all of this hand wringing, and “I told you so,” is just conjecture, and possibly political posturing around an agenda...nothing more.
Whew, the voice of reason; thank you! I’ll admit it’s troubling about Leavitt pitching “Romney’s Plan”, or “Obamacare”! But I’ve never, ever seen where Mike Leavitt was a leftist! As our Utah governor, he was really quite conservative, I thought; at least as far as I know. I don’t know where all of this came from, or what got into Leavitt. As our governor several years ago, he was mostly pretty conservative, pro-life, pro-military, etc.. It makes me mad when people start calling him a leftist or a socialist!
A man is known by the company he keeps. Romney has surrounded himself with rinos.
At the end of April Romney publicly endorsed gay couples adopting indigent children. Gay couples? Adoption!