This will never work because it relies on the private sector rather than government handouts!
1 posted on
06/06/2012 2:44:46 PM PDT by
Zakeet
To: Zakeet
They’d be better off to build a canal.
2 posted on
06/06/2012 2:47:54 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: Zakeet
"....get their goods across the state for
pennies on the dollar compared to what it costs to haul freight in tractor-trailers"
LOL, let's the accounting on that. More like hundreds of pennies
3 posted on
06/06/2012 2:49:33 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: Zakeet
We already have that.. its called “TRAINS”...
Like in choo choo trains..
4 posted on
06/06/2012 2:50:25 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
To: Zakeet
Teamsters and other union thugs - hardest hit
6 posted on
06/06/2012 2:50:42 PM PDT by
lormand
(A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
To: Zakeet
Just think how many Mexicans can be crammed into a cargo container and how fast they can be sent north.
I'm all for alleviating the traffic problems on I-35, but this would need some heavy-duty safeguards.
8 posted on
06/06/2012 2:52:22 PM PDT by
Charles Martel
(Endeavor to persevere...)
To: Zakeet
What Texan could possibly argue with installing a full-length shade cover over I-35? LOL
12 posted on
06/06/2012 2:54:53 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Zakeet
It is an interesting idea of creative thinking. You take the existing paradigm and shift it or turn it inside out. Instead of worrying about mass high-speed passenger transport, you apply the new technology to freight transport, and let the people continue travelling as they do now.
Still, it does seem a little wacky. Sending freight one car at a time along electric rails? A conventional train might move a lot more stuff with less energy consumption in a reasonable period if there's no urgency. If there is urgency, we have other ways to get the goods where they have to go.
20 posted on
06/06/2012 3:08:11 PM PDT by
x
To: Zakeet
From the article:
The prospect of reducing truck traffic on the I-35 corridor excited several members of the Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition. Tarrant County Judge Glen Whitley said he could envision moving people on trains in the highway right-of-way, too, instead of relying on railroad tracks owned and controlled by freight companies.
IOW....we don't want private industry getting involved in something government can (ought to) control.
The existing rail/truck transportation system is as efficient as it can get, given existing infrastructure and population density. Call me very skeptical on this pie in the sky idea.
24 posted on
06/06/2012 3:15:36 PM PDT by
rottndog
(Be Prepared.....for what's coming AFTER America.)
To: Zakeet
Sounds similiar to the NAFTA SuperHighway that open border RINOs like Medved keep trying to tell us is a figment of our imagination.
26 posted on
06/06/2012 3:16:46 PM PDT by
MachIV
To: Zakeet
If it can get these slow poke trucks off the road, then I say build it.
27 posted on
06/06/2012 3:17:39 PM PDT by
SteelToe
To: Zakeet
This isn’t another segment of the Trans Texas Tollway, is it?
32 posted on
06/06/2012 4:02:27 PM PDT by
getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
(chirping birds + basket weavers who sit + smile + twiddle their thumbs + toes They're coming to take)
To: Zakeet
36 posted on
06/06/2012 4:17:54 PM PDT by
ExCTCitizen
(If we stay home in November '12, don't blame 0 for tearing up the CONSTITUTION!!)
To: Zakeet
Powered by electricity? We had rolling brownouts last summer. Is there suddenly a glut of electrical power?
55 posted on
06/06/2012 5:19:41 PM PDT by
Sarajevo
(Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive.)
To: Zakeet
58 posted on
06/06/2012 5:50:54 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Zakeet
LOL! Fantastic comment, Zakeet!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson