Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo; LucyT; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...
Ping.............

In one of his most telling passages, Mr. Klaidman depicts a passive commander in chief who often procrastinated in the hopes that problems would go away, a sharp divergence from the engaged and proactive president of the official narrative. "The president's own elusiveness created confusion about who was in control of policy," Mr. Klaidman writes. "In this vacuum his advisers fought brutally, each side invoking the president in support of its cause."

Does anyone expect a cowardly fag to act differently?

6 posted on 06/09/2012 10:59:23 AM PDT by melancholy (Professor Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist, Ph.D in L0w and H0lder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: melancholy
"The president's own elusiveness created confusion about who was in control of policy,"

No doubt it's Jarrett and Mooch making decisions for him. He cannot speak without his 'prompter and likely hems and haws with indecision for everything else. Soros, Immelt and all who wrought this group upon us probably have their knickers in a twist wondering what guffaws will surface next given their hefty financial and personal investments in him and those around him (a presidency by proxy). Holder is becoming quite the nemesis on his own.

37 posted on 06/09/2012 4:00:33 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson