To: Perdogg
Unfortunately a challenge by a former presidential candidate carries the backage of looking like a political attack. Better to have an ordinary citizen behind it.
To: plain talk
Unfortunately a challenge by a former presidential candidate carries the baggage of looking like a political attack. Better to have an ordinary citizen behind it.Sadly the courts have repeatably and consistently rules that no ordinary citizen nor member of the Armed Services has "standing" to determine if the current Commander-in-Chief and President of these United States is constitutionally qualified to hold that high office.
Repeatably and consistently.
16 posted on
06/11/2012 11:02:00 AM PDT by
null and void
(Day 1238 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama is not a Big Brother [he's a Big Sissy...])
To: plain talk
I disagree and I will tell you why. If that were the case and if Jones V Bush did not set a standard for standing, then there would have been a flood of lawsuits against President G.W. Bush. We have a system to challege the President in matter.
1. Elections
2. Electorial College session.
17 posted on
06/11/2012 11:02:20 AM PDT by
Perdogg
To: plain talk
Unfortunately a challenge by a former presidential candidate carries the backage of looking like a political attack. Better to have an ordinary citizen behind it. Candidates mean a political attack; citizens have no standing. NO ONE is able/willing to enforce this national security provision of the US Constitution.
That is to say: America is HOSED.
101 posted on
06/11/2012 6:52:25 PM PDT by
TexasVoter
(No Constitution? No Union!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson