Replies

I'm curious if it has yet been defined just who in the hell actually has standing?

The answer to that question is found by examining the jurisdiction in which the Supreme Court is sitting when they rule. And that jurisdiction is federal administrative. Thus they are limited to ruling on issues of federal administration, which is either internal governmental issues or... corporate issues. Because the federal government issues articles of incorporations, which then exist under federal administrative corporate law.

I'm sorry, did you hear anything in the above that addresses natural human beings? Either does the Supreme Court.

So who has standing? Government officials acting in their administrative capacities, and corporate officers acting in their corporate capacities.

But what about The People?

:: shrug ::

To rule on an issue concerning The People, the Supreme Court would have to choose to sit in their Common Law jurisdictional capacity.

They haven't chosen to do that.

But don't worry. At any time, the COULD choose to do that, and then they'd be shocked - shocked, I tell you - that Obama's NBC status wasn't certified.

So, hypothetically, an incorporated car dealer who lost his dealership because an illegal president illegally bailed out the manufacturer of the cars he sold, then illegally had the manufacturers shut down dealerships owned by opposition party members might have standing IF he filed on behalf of his corporation, AND that he had reasonable cause to suspect INDIVIDUAL harm from the illegal presidents actions?

UNLESS he filed as an individual, OR The Court thought he wasn't the only dealership so harmed?

Did I get that right?