If any one of the 50 states ruled Obama ineligible due to either his father or concern about his birth certificate, then a federal case would be sparked that the US Supreme Court would accept.
However, as long as all 50 states agree Obama is eligible, there is no conflict to resolve.
In like manner, it would only have taken 1 of 100 senators, and 1 of 435 representatives to force Congress to rule on the meaning of NBC in 2009...but when 100/100 agree, and 435/435 agree, there is nothing to resolve. There simply is no conflict.
When every state and every member of Congress believe the Constitution should be interpreted as XYZ, the Court is not going to step in and insist the meaning is ZYX.
Mass ignorance, political partisanship and accepting an incorrect claim at face value does not = agreement among all the parties you listed. This is just another dumb Fogger argument.