Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana First State to Allow Citizens to Shoot Law Enforcement Officers
AllGov ^ | June 11, 2012 | Noel Brinkerhoff

Posted on 06/12/2012 4:31:20 AM PDT by Rennes Templar

Police officers in Indiana are upset over a new law allowing residents to use deadly force against public servants, including law enforcement officers, who unlawfully enter their homes. It was signed by Republican Governor Mitch Daniels in March.

The first of its kind in the United States, the law was adopted after the state Supreme Court went too far in one of its rulings last year, according to supporters. The case in question involved a man who assaulted an officer during a domestic violence call. The court ruled that there was “no right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers.”

The National Rifle Association lobbied for the new law, arguing that the court decision had legalized police to commit unjustified entries.

Tim Downs, president of the Indiana State Fraternal Order of Police, which opposed the legislation, said the law could open the way for people who are under the influence or emotionally distressed to attack officers in their homes.

“It’s just a recipe for disaster,” Downs told Bloomberg. “It just puts a bounty on our heads.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: 2012; banglist; donttreadonme; donutwatch; homeascastle; indiana; lawenforcement; leo; mitchdaniel; mitchdaniels; nra; swat; swatabuse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 421-429 next last
To: Ratman83

The cops never made it to the door unmolested by Barnes ~ who’d told the officer on the scene in the parking lot that he’d left.


161 posted on 06/12/2012 11:40:55 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
There was no property dispute. He told the cop he had moved out.

Wrong. It would have been trespassing if he was not the lawful resident, or robbery if there was no property dispute.

That he was in the process of leaving his wife was irrelevant.

162 posted on 06/12/2012 11:43:52 AM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

That right there is unlawful entry. If they do not identify themselves and then still decide to storm in through the door, in any homeowners view, they are a intruder and can legally be shot.


163 posted on 06/12/2012 11:48:26 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Maybe ~ check your state’s statutes and precedental court judgments.

Exactly my point. "Damsel in distress" is not a legitimate infraction of the legal code.

164 posted on 06/12/2012 11:51:36 AM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Reed attempted to enter the apartment, and Barnes shoved him against the wall. Attempted unlawful entry by the police.
165 posted on 06/12/2012 11:53:02 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
Oh, yeah? Hardly the case. The Indiana Supreme Court didn't even deal with that issue ~ the majority decision simply said you couldn't lawfully resist even unlawful entry by the cops.

The guy didn't live there. He'd announced his intention. His stuff was out, and if it wasn't out he was entitled to his day in court to make his claim and in most places even have the Sheriff HELP HIM remove it.

The woman asked the cops to come to her place ~ and her right is paramount in this case. Don't ignore her right. The police actions follow directly from it.

166 posted on 06/12/2012 11:54:04 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83

No, assault and battery by Barnes. The cop was there at the request of the woman who was by that moment the sole lawful occupant of the apartment.


167 posted on 06/12/2012 11:55:18 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

That’s still wrong the cops are there in the first place. Guy did nothing wrong and yet has to stand down in his own house? That’s the strong arm thuggery tactics that this law will prevent which is a good idea other states could learn from.


168 posted on 06/12/2012 11:56:16 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

I used to be one of the biggest pro-WoD cop boosters here. My mind changed a while back based on watching trends in the news and my own personal experiences with LEOs, both official and casual (listening to LEOs talk shop when they think no one is listening is eye-opening). I think a lot of folks have had similar epiphanies.


169 posted on 06/12/2012 11:57:12 AM PDT by jboot (Emperor: "How will this end?" Kosh: "In fire.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
You are entirely too dramatic. This is a case ~ a simple case actually ~ where a woman invited the cops over on official business.

The cops came. A guy jumped them at the door.

He was certainly not trying to defend her!

170 posted on 06/12/2012 11:57:34 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

Wasn’t his house. He’d already said that to the cop in the parking lot.


171 posted on 06/12/2012 11:59:02 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; Blue Highway
The guy didn't live there. He'd announced his intention. His stuff was out, and if it wasn't out he was entitled to his day in court to make his claim and in most places even have the Sheriff HELP HIM remove it.He was moving out, he was getting his stuff and leaving he was not out.

The woman asked the cops to come to her place But she did not give them permission to enter the apartment when they asked.

172 posted on 06/12/2012 12:00:35 PM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
It was highly relevant. That's the whole point. He'd moved out. All his stuff was there in the truck. He no longer had any apparent property interest in the apartment, and if he did the courts stand ready for claims every day but Saturday and Sunday.

There is literally no reason whatsoever for Barnes to have returned to the apartment and pushed a cop.

173 posted on 06/12/2012 12:02:00 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83
Review her phone call please. She gave them all the permission they needed to come and visit with her. She was not trying to close the door either ~ it appears to have been opened!

Barnes struck first ~ always a bad move. This law doesn't change that ~ in fact, when Barnes struck the officer he had probable cause to do a lot of things. He didn't do everything he could have.

75 years ago Barnes would have gone to the hospital next.

174 posted on 06/12/2012 12:04:38 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Wasn’t his house. He’d already said that to the cop in the parking lot.

He never said that, he said he was getting his stuff and leaving.

175 posted on 06/12/2012 12:08:25 PM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83

Right, the cops bullied their way in to the apartment. They have no business in doing so. No search warrant, no consent. They should be considered intruders once they cross that threshold in this circumstance.


176 posted on 06/12/2012 12:08:25 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
It was highly relevant. That's the whole point. He'd moved out. All his stuff was there in the truck.

Putting all your stuff in a truck does not terminate your residency.

As I said, it would have been trespassing if he had no right to be there.

177 posted on 06/12/2012 12:09:25 PM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Actualy Barnes was in the doorway, for the officer to enter he had to touch Barnes and Barnes responded.


178 posted on 06/12/2012 12:11:11 PM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Perhaps this will make them check addresses more carefully?


179 posted on 06/12/2012 12:11:46 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Migrating elephant herds react badly to flaming motor homes and dry ice doesn't repel killer bees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83
The door was open. Barnes attempt to prevent the officer from meeting with the woman could well have been taken in what amounts to kidnapping almost anywhere.

Look, guys, I don't really care if you beat your women, but keep it at home, behind closed doors, and with plenty of soundproofing. You go running around in the parking lot making noise I will find my peaceable use of my own property endangered and will call the cops.

I lived in a highrise once where the local sewer authority decided to drill a tunnel through solid rock immediately below my window. They were given from 7 AM to 7 PM To do the job. Once or twice they carried on until 10 PM. Then came the day when they kept it up until the wee hours of the morning.

There were numerous people who fired on the transformer that provided them the power to run their drills and the cooler that kept their beer cold, and the portapotty.

Wasn't me BTW, but I was really surprised how many rounds were involved ~ a regular range party Fur Shur.

The cops didn't respond until the next day. That's one of the few times I thought they did a really good job.

Oh, they didn't even interview people but, of course, nobody had seen or heard a thing.

180 posted on 06/12/2012 12:12:15 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 421-429 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson