[muawiyah]

The history of this particular law is INESCAPABLE and will show up in almost any defense argument ~ and what would that be perhaps? Well, that the cops were called and they didn't show up and he beat her to death or she shot him and if they'd gotten there it'd all been good so I want $100000000 from the taxpayers because the cops didn't show up.

The cops will defend themselves quite well against any charge that they could have shown up. Obviously the law doesn't require them to get involved. But the history takes things beyond that and tells us that THEY'D BEST NOT!

[D-fendr]

The cops will defend themselves quite well against any charge that they could have shown up.

How does this law affect this? Do you see anything in the law that addresses this? Or changes it? Is there anything in the law that would help the cops defend themselves against any charge that they could have shown up

I'm focusing on the law. What part of it do you object to? What in it makes you think it's legal to shoot cops for unlawful entry, if that is your view? What part of it justifies cops not performing their legal duties just as before the law?

[D-fendr]

I can probably help by being more specific.

I believe you are saying the case will or can be used to defend the cops not showing up.

How specifically would a defense do this? What would be their argument?