Skip to comments.
MILLER: Cover up in D.C.'s arrest of Iraq vet
The Washington Times ^
| 11 June, 2012
| Emily Miller
Posted on 06/12/2012 11:12:05 AM PDT by marktwain
Army 1st Sergeant Matthew Corrigan learned the hard way that the District of Columbia doesnt believe it has to abide by the U.S. Constitution like the 50 states do. The city ignores the Fourth Amendment right of Americans to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures. If police cant be bothered to obtain a search warrant, officers have no problem busting open your front door and taking your property.
Most of all, Washington officials do not abide by the full meaning and spirit of the Second Amendment. The District believes it alone can bestow the right to keep arms on those who can afford hefty fees, pass a written test and tell the government about every single firearm owned. The Founding Fathers would be appalled.
(This is the fourth part of the series on Sgt. Corrigans case. Click here to read part 1,part 2 and part 3.
The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) didn't give much thought to the Constitution late at night when its SWAT team blew through due process and into the home of Sgt. Corrigan without a warrant.
The veteran was suspected of having a personal gun in his home that was not registered with the city.
In the light of day, the department realized its case was jeopardized by the lack of a warrant. So it came up with a story of exigent circumstances to cover for this oversight.
Sgt. Corrigan's attorney unraveled the scheme before trial, and the D.C. Office of the Attorney General was forced in May to drop all ten misdemeanor charges against the defendant.
However, the damage to the reservist who volunteered to serve a year in Iraq was beyond repair. He is currently suing the city for a minimum of $500,000 in damages.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitution; corrigan; coverup; dc; matthewcorrigan
The sick part is that all United States taxpayers are made to support the D.C. politicians who routinely violate their oath of office.
1
posted on
06/12/2012 11:12:19 AM PDT
by
marktwain
To: marktwain
DC’s council chambers should be a pretty good place to get acquainted with the local criminal element, if you get my drift....
2
posted on
06/12/2012 11:30:38 AM PDT
by
pointsal
To: marktwain
Can anyone determine the race of the clowns who did this to the Ssargent?
Could it be another case of “HolderPersons” acting out their ‘inner racist’?
If so, hate crime charges might make the settlement rather larger.
3
posted on
06/12/2012 11:47:38 AM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
To: marktwain
Those f'in Commies running the D.C. regime of local corruption need to hear just two words from patriots whose Constitutional rights are violated with middle-of-the-night raids without warrants, illegal search and seizure, etc., and those two words are:
'OPEN FIRE!'
Hey, self-defense, home invasions happen all the time, who knows for sure who it is busting in the front and back doors?
4
posted on
06/12/2012 11:59:35 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
To: mkjessup; marktwain
Hey, self-defense, home invasions happen all the time, who knows for sure who it is busting in the front and back doors?
Police officers in Indiana are upset over a new law allowing residents to use deadly force against public servants, including law enforcement officers, who unlawfully enter their homes. It was signed by Republican Governor Mitch Daniels in March.
5
posted on
06/12/2012 12:28:27 PM PDT
by
caveat emptor
(Zippity Do Dah)
To: caveat emptor
Now that right there makes me view Mitch Daniels just a bit more favorably.
Now Romney should advocate the passing of federal legislation giving absolute unconditional immunity to ANY United States citizen who opens fire on ANY federal, state or local official who forces their way into a home or business WITHOUT obtaining a proper lawful warrant (in accordance with our Constitution).
Who in their right mind could possibly oppose that?
(except perhaps for our institutional fascist goons and thugs who believe that a badge gives them extra-Constitutional authority to do as they damn well please)
6
posted on
06/12/2012 2:36:52 PM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
To: mkjessup
The article about the vet had nothing to do with the Indiana law - I had only part four, and it seemed like it might be appropriate. Try reading parts 1,2, and 3 if you have any interest. Totally disgusting behavior all around - not his though. He moved out of D.C. as soon as he was cleared and released, and apparently has filed a $500,000
lawsuit against the lot of them.
7
posted on
06/13/2012 12:09:20 AM PDT
by
caveat emptor
(Zippity Do Dah)
To: marktwain
A no knock swat raid over misdemeanors....sickening.
8
posted on
06/13/2012 12:16:51 AM PDT
by
Vigilantcitizen
(Dave Mustaine for president.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson