Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa: Romney 47%, Obama 46%
Rasmussen Reports ^ | June 12, 2012

Posted on 06/12/2012 3:28:41 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

President Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney are in a near tie in Rasmussen Reports’ first look at the critical battleground state of Iowa.

A new telephone survey of Likely Iowa Voters shows Romney earning 47% support to Obama’s 46%. Three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and four percent (4%) are undecided

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Uncle Slayton
To the contrary, this is an indication that Romney is poised to sweep the swing states. If this poll is accurate and Obama is indeed at 46% in Iowa, that points towards at least a 54-46% win for Romney. Because Obama is not going to "win" any voters between now and November. If any incumbent is below 50%, they are in deep trouble in a two-man race.

More likely, this poll is oversampling Democrats and Obama could well be down closer to 40% and facing a 60-40% blowout in Iowa.

21 posted on 06/12/2012 4:23:20 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

47-46 ain’t real.

Remember Wisconsin!


22 posted on 06/12/2012 4:25:11 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Read SCOTUS Castle Rock vs Gonzales before dialing 911!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage
Someone want to explain to me how 46% of the country (assuming) wants 4 more years of Communism...

Because we're near the tipping point, and a good enough portion of the other side stands to gain from 4 more years of the welfare state, entitlements, or are in the well-paid public sector, or are just plain "takers" with nary a care as to what their kids and grand-kids inherit for a society, country, nation.

23 posted on 06/12/2012 4:32:39 PM PDT by C210N ("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I used to work with some guys from Iowa. Nice guys, but every one of them was a Dem. Must be the ethanol.


24 posted on 06/12/2012 4:34:58 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real

Considering that Obama won Iowa 54-44% in 2008, this represents a huge loss of support for him.


25 posted on 06/12/2012 4:37:48 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage
Because 46% of the American voting public are a mixture of communists, liars, have serious economic problems, are jobless, in unimaginable debt, criminals, addicts, black and vote skin color, gay, frauds, criminals, pricks, anti-capitalists, anti-Americans, and religion-hating satanists that love muslim assholes.

LLS



26 posted on 06/12/2012 4:40:24 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

In reply to your post number 2, it’s because they don’t care and still hope that their dependency on government will be unaffected by the litany of horrors you recited.And in the case of blacks,they bloc vote based on race alone. As for the rest of the Obama cultists, I’ll paraphrase Sean Hannity: If Obama was seen stealing the purse of a little girl on the White House lawn, the libs would excuse it by saying he intended to give it to a homeless man.


27 posted on 06/12/2012 5:04:27 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: so_real

Neither, Obama looks to be in bad shape.


28 posted on 06/12/2012 5:21:29 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

“Someone want to explain to me how 46% of the country....”

Easy... that figure is likely very close to population of those feeding at the public trough, in one way or another.

Romney is failing to light anyone on fire, so regardless of all the reasons why not to vote for Obama, this race remains Obama’s to lose.


29 posted on 06/12/2012 5:24:59 PM PDT by Gator113 (***YOU GAVE it to Obama. I would have voted for NEWT.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I think that Romney will win Iowa, but it will be close. He’ll get about 50%, in IA. In 2010, Iowa elected a Republican to the U.S. Senate and a republican for governor.


30 posted on 06/12/2012 5:36:13 PM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Just a few observations from an Iowa geezer:
- I see a lot less Obama stickers on cars these days and the ones that I do see are 4 years old. I see quite a few Romney signs.
- Mr Cash for Clunkers (Rep Bruce Braley) barely won his seat in 2010. The 3rd party candidate drew just enough votes to get him re-elected.
- The Ag economy is going gang-busters. Farmers need cheap fuel to keep their profits up and Barry’s cancellation of the pipeline didn’t do him any favors.
- My Iowa son-in-law and nephew are UAW members in their early 30’s and are conservative. The younger generation sees what the debt is doing their childrens future and their retirement plans.

I DO NOT see the Obama fever that existed 4 years ago.


31 posted on 06/12/2012 7:22:36 PM PDT by IAGeezer912 (Carpe Diem, Per Diem, Doris Diem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

My first thought too. Well, kinda.


32 posted on 06/12/2012 7:25:52 PM PDT by stevio (God, guns, guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Nonsense. I am very fired up to vote for Romney as he is the only one who can puts TJE obamunist from office at this point.


33 posted on 06/12/2012 7:29:37 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
“Politically, Iowa is the most liberal of the farm states “

You may want to look at Wisconsin and Minnesota first.

34 posted on 06/12/2012 7:30:10 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland ("The writing is on the wall - Unions are screwed. reformist2 10:04 PM #27"\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

As the economy gets worse, obama flails and flops around, Romney will move way ahead as he does not scare indes or demos pissed off at gaybama.


35 posted on 06/12/2012 7:32:19 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

You go right ahead and be fired up about your RINO Romney, I will never be.

I want to see Obama tossed out of office as much as anyone, but that a$$ Romney will never get my support, before or after the election.


36 posted on 06/12/2012 7:44:52 PM PDT by Gator113 (***YOU GAVE it to Obama. I would have voted for NEWT.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote
Some of the voters will see Barack “Chauncey Gardner” Obama for who he really is this year. The big question will be how many have their eyes opened.
37 posted on 06/12/2012 7:48:33 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland ("The writing is on the wall - Unions are screwed. reformist2 10:04 PM #27"\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Chauncey the Choomer Obama, taking care of Moochelle’s Garden.

Please don't eat the Choomies.

38 posted on 06/12/2012 7:53:14 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (The only good Zombie is a dead Zombie, oh wait...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Obama must go. Romney stinks I agree, but he is the only one right now in a position to oust Obama.


39 posted on 06/12/2012 7:54:18 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote
Obama must go. Romney stinks I agree, but he is the only one right now in a position to oust Obama.

Agreed. I was one who used to say no more of this lesser of 2 evils business, but then came along the Kenyan Marxist, who has taken evil to a whole new level.

40 posted on 06/12/2012 8:01:16 PM PDT by Marathoner (If the choice was Obama vs. Satan I'd have to flip a coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson