Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hodar

I’m with you. We speak the same language and I see where you’re having trouble. The problem you’re experiencing is that you’re not thinking like a liberal. Or more specifically, you are interpreting liberal actions by applying logic. Take it from me - stop doing that. It will only make your head hurt.

The liberals can’t go after EBT card users because that’s their voting base. Annoying that group is akin to committing political suicide. At the same time, they are still liberals. They have to be seen as “doing something” about the “problem”. It doesn’t matter what the problem is or if their “solution” actually fixes the problem. All that matters is that they are “doing something”

So in that vein, they bestow upon themselves the power to ban large sodas. Surely no one could be against that, right? After all, who needs 64 oz. of soda?

But - the cries come in - what about other things that are “bad” for you. Things like popcorn, candy, ice cream and others. If, the liberals think, we have the power to ban large sodas why shouldn’t we also ban these huge tubs of popcorn, 5 scoop sundaes, and jumbo bags of candy? After all, those are just as bad as soda, aren’t they?

This is the liberal mindset. And they miss the single important point in the whole debate: What about free will? What about - shameless plug here - Personal responsibility? Where do the liberals get off thinking they have power to ban ANYTHING?

The reasons their arguments make no sense is because they are totalitarian in nature and we are not totalitarian. The reason you had a problem understanding it is that you tried to apply logic to people who are acting irrationally.


45 posted on 06/13/2012 11:56:14 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Behind enemy lines in the city where it's illegal to buy a Big Gulp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Personal Responsibility
So in that vein, they bestow upon themselves the power to ban large sodas. Surely no one could be against that, right? After all, who needs 64 oz. of soda?

It started long before sodas- it started with smoking and non smoking sections and then out right bans. They convinced the populace that was perfectly fine and now they can't be stopped .

If you think this is just a liberal thing you need to rethink that. During the height of the smoking ban articles there were plenty of so called conservative FReepers that were all in favor of them, no matter how many times they were warned it would lead to stuff like this. They are probably being blind sided and up in arms about this nonsense - but with their support of the smoking bans on private property they opened the door for this to happen.

55 posted on 06/13/2012 1:00:27 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Personal Responsibility

Awesome reply!


58 posted on 06/13/2012 1:12:31 PM PDT by Hodar (Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.- A. Schopenhauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson