As I recall, the Michigan laws in question were lobbied for by the State KKK in order to keep black people disarmed. I think they were first put into effect during the early 1920s.
1 posted on
06/13/2012 9:20:07 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
No registration, no permit to purchase, so how does that work for private sales?
2 posted on
06/13/2012 9:24:16 AM PDT by
absolootezer0
(2x divorced tattooed pierced harley hatin meghan mccain luvin' REAL beer drinkin' smoker ..what?)
To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...
The Constitution of the State of Michigan of 1963 Article 1, Section 6 reads:
Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.
3 posted on
06/13/2012 9:24:16 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: marktwain
>>In 1925, Dr. Ossian Sweet was acquitted of defending his home from a mob of people who were upset with the gall of a black man who dared to integrate a white neighborhood.
Ector, was referring to the Michigan court case which many have credited as being the genesis of the 1927 Michigan Firearms Act. This law created County Gun Boards, required the licensing of handguns, and made acquiring Concealed Pistol Licenses (CPLs) and handguns difficult for most black people.<<
http://www.concealcarry.org/open-carry-being-encouraged-in-detroit/
4 posted on
06/13/2012 9:29:35 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: marktwain
Got any idea what post 11 means. I can’t decipher the legalese but it sure looks like they voted and passed it in the house.
13 posted on
06/13/2012 12:59:00 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson