Natural Law? Enumerated Powers?
These two concepts form the basis of our Federal system. 99.99% of the idiotocracy won’t understand what you are talking about. If they did understand the concepts they would never support them at the ballot box.
The civil war settled the question of State Sovereignty and FDR and his courts destroyed what was left of the constraints on Federal Power.
The “greatest generation” fought WWII and came back believing the Federal Government was the premier force for good in the world. So they wanted it powerful enough to do good.
So here we are. You can’t put it back in the box.
I fully agree that 90% of the people today are either too stupid or too stubborn to believe anythig that I posted.
All I can do is educate those who wish to learn the truth.
Reserving your rights is entirely up to you, but rest assured the Supreme has confirmed your right to do so.
In accordance with the following U.S. Supreme Court case:
“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905).
Thus, be it known to all that I reserve my natural common law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability associated with the compelled and pretended “benefit” of any hidden or unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
Then there is this one:
This position is in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Brady v. U.S., 379 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970):
“Waivers of Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts, done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences.”