Okay, we can add this as another back-up challenge should SCOTUS find the interstate commerce clause is as elastic as Obama and Pelosi seem to think it is.
I’ve been proposing that someone should challenge Obamacare as being in violation of the “generalized right to privacy” discovered in Roe v. Wade. The ‘reasoning’ in that case was that the government had no right to intervene in patient-physician decisions because because such decisions were protected by the mystically conjured “generalized right to privacy”. Obamacare is nothing but a huge compendium of government interventions in patient-physician decisions. (Large quantities of popcorn would be called for while watching the left’s reaction to such a challenge.)
Popcorn will, of course, be banned by then. (NYC taking the lead there.)