Correct.
and if that means that we don’t want to eat and it causes us to die, that doesn’t mean you can force us to eat
This is an illogical leap. You have gone from the very real right to life to the completely fictional "right to die" as if the former implies the latter.
It does not in any way.
Further, this woman is clearly mentally ill and not in command of her faculties.
I side with Liberty. If she’s mentally ill, then her family should commit her and let the psychological sciences figure it out.
To have a COURT say that she must be force fed is a breach of liberty and a very dangerous precedent to be setting. If a court can decide you can be force fed, what else can they decide you MUST do?