The sad thing here is that these questions may very well have been his way of finding out as well. Had he even broached the subject of the Paypal account with them before the hearing?? If not, then why not???
One would have thought that since bailbond testimony is different and has to be full and without omission of any kind, that O'Mara should have and would have advised his client[s] accordingly before the hearing. And the Paypal money has to be in a Trust account by Florida Law. Did he advise them of that. He may have, but then again, he is not and was not Shelly's counsel, just George's -- a sad fact that she now realizes as she searches for one of her own.
Now I recall that shortly after the bond hearing, a news story broke that the court had been mislead about the cash donations. Then shortly after that, O’Mara announced that he had set up a trust fund for the donations and had taken down GZ’s original website.
I think that it is very obvious at this point that he was not aware of the large sum of cash before the bond hearing.