Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Don’t Extend Bush Tax Cuts for Wealthy
National Journal ^ | 06/19/2012 | Shane Goldmacher

Posted on 06/19/2012 7:21:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story gave the incorrect percent of the public that wants tax breaks across all income levels made permanent. Eighteen percent polled support the position taken by Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

As President Obama navigates a choppy economy in his reelection bid, he can rely on one comforting fact: Americans continue to strongly embrace his opposition to extending tax breaks for those earning more than $250,000 a year.

A new United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll shows that only 26 percent of the public wants to see all of the tax breaks created during the George W. Bush administration, which are set to expire at year’s end, extended for at least another year. And only 18 percent want the tax breaks across all income levels made permanent, the position taken by Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

That the broader public prefers taxing the rich to taxing themselves is not surprising. But the poll results offer evidence of the political benefits that the president can derive from his opposition to the Bush-era tax breaks for high-income earners. Obama has made this a centerpiece of his campaign. It also shows the difficulties that the GOP faces trying to convince voters that the $250,000 threshold hits small businesses and would hurt the economy, and why that narrative has gained little traction with the public at large.

In the poll, 47 percent of respondents said they wanted to see the tax breaks extended only for those earning less than $250,000. Eighteen percent said they prefer that all the tax breaks simply expire, which would result in higher taxes across the income spectrum.

The question of how to handle the expiration of the Bush tax cuts, of course, will be settled not on the campaign trail but in Congress. No action is expected until after the fall elections, when the lame-duck Congress will have to tackle not only the Bush tax cuts, but automatic cutbacks to defense spending, an expiring payroll-tax break, the rising estate tax, and a potential debt-ceiling increase. Collectively, that looming fiscal fight has become known as “Taxmaggedon.”

Republicans have argued that raising taxes amid an economic downturn could plunge the country back into recession. And Democrats have not stayed united in opposition, as former President Clinton made waves this month when he suggested in a televised interview that lawmakers should “avoid anything that would contract the economy now.” He later issued a clarifying statement saying he supported Obama’s position.

“Even Bill Clinton came out for it, before he was against it,” House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said.

The opposition to extending the Bush-era tax breaks for those earning above $250,000 spanned across every ethnic and age group in the poll, with young voters most opposed. Opinion did differ among various income groups. Only 21 percent of those who earn less than $30,000 a year want the tax breaks for all earners extended; 28 percent of those earning between $30,000 and $75,000 want them extended; and 31 percent among those earning at least $75,000 favor the across-the-board extension.

With less than five months until the November elections, the survey shows how both Democrats and Republicans have tried to stake out popular positions on fiscal issues not just among their respective bases, but also among the critical independent swing voters that determine elections.

For Obama, that means talking about the Bush tax cuts. For Republicans, it’s pushing small-business tax breaks, rather than more spending on things like highways and infrastructure, to pump up the slumping economy.

It’s no accident that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., pushed through legislation this year that promised business-tax breaks to spur hiring. Obama embraced Cantor’s Jobs Act, despite angering some in his own party, and the pair made a rare joint appearance for a Rose Garden signing ceremony.

When asked what Congress could do to help the economy and create jobs, the top answer picked by poll respondents (37 percent of them) was “passing tax cuts for small businesses to encourage them to hire more workers.”

Republicans particularly embraced that approach (52 percent), but it was also the most popular option selected among both Democratic voters (35 percent) and independents (32 percent).

Business-tax breaks easily outpolled added taxes on imported goods (24 percent), using a transportation bill to promote road-building (20 percent), and added subsidies to promote the use of clean energy (11 percent). Clearly, three years after the stimulus package, the public still appears to doubt the ability of government investments to help the economy.

The strong showing for new taxes on foreign products, meanwhile, was only one example of a protectionist streak coursing through the electorate, according to the survey. A majority, 52 percent, also said that “economic competition from foreign countries selling their goods here” has contributed “a lot” to suppressing U.S. family incomes.

There was no party split on that question: A majority of Democrats, Republicans, and independents agreed that goods produced abroad were depressing incomes here. That was the highest figure of the four choices presented in the poll. The next most popular, checking in at 47 percent, was that government policies “give too many tax breaks to the wealthy,” followed by 46 percent who blamed “government spending and regulation.”

Finishing a distant fourth, with only 25 percent of respondents saying it had “a lot” of impact on suppressing family incomes, was “the decline in labor-union membership.”

The United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll was conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International, which surveyed 1,002 adults by landline and cell phone on June 14-17. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points. The margin of error is higher for subgroups.

Infographic



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; tax; taxcuts; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: SeekAndFind

New poll questions:

Should obama raise taxes on my employer?
Should obama raise my taxes?


21 posted on 06/19/2012 7:59:06 AM PDT by silverleaf (Every human spent about half an hour as a single cell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The bottom line of the graphic reveals who was polled

fuggedaboutit


22 posted on 06/19/2012 8:01:40 AM PDT by silverleaf (Every human spent about half an hour as a single cell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
My hope is that the “poll” in November isn’t manipulated by voter fraud. My fear is that it will be.

You can rest assured that there will be fraud in favor of the Democrats in MD, NJ, IL, NY, MA, to name just the most egregious examples.

23 posted on 06/19/2012 8:01:40 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

These polls could be true, and I second what you say. Also, most of the world is, still, “stuck with leftist politics” of some kind, too, with nearly all of the world’s “conservative political parties”, also, continuing to remain to the left (and, in many cases, to the far left) of “U.S. conservatism”.


24 posted on 06/19/2012 8:07:16 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
There will soon be no wealth to tax.

Zephaniah 1:18

Neither their silver nor their gold Shall be able to deliver them In the day of the LORD's wrath; But the whole land shall be devoured By the fire of His jealousy, For He will make speedy riddance Of all those who dwell in the land.

Ezekiel 7:19

They will throw their silver into the streets, And their gold will be like refuse; Their silver and their gold will not be able to deliver them In the day of the wrath of the LORD; They will not satisfy their souls, Nor fill their stomachs, Because it became their stumbling block of iniquity.

All that God has provided is being lost to history. We have brought our downfall by electing this son of a harlot named Obama.

25 posted on 06/19/2012 8:08:28 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Romney - not Obama - not a Conservative - not a real Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Thank God for granting the wisdom to the founders to have the Electoral College.

It tends to isolate the effects of ‘rat fraud.


26 posted on 06/19/2012 8:10:35 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; All

http://www.heritage.org/research/factsheets/2012/06/how-will-taxmageddon-impact-you

Check out how much extra tax the democrats plan to filch in 2013 from those fellas behind the tree. What’s an extra $500 BILLION in taxes gonna do to your wallet?

http://www.heritage.org/issues/taxes/taxmageddon
Plenty of interesting reading.
This is 6 months away.
The sheeple figure Congress is gonna stop this before it happens....


27 posted on 06/19/2012 8:11:32 AM PDT by silverleaf (Every human spent about half an hour as a single cell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The sample consisted of 1,007 adults sitting on their couches during a workday contacted by phone.”


28 posted on 06/19/2012 8:15:48 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why did these tax cuts have an expiration date?


29 posted on 06/19/2012 8:21:58 AM PDT by PauldArco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
You can rest assured . . . .

I am not feeling "assured" by your claim. The thought that the democRATS will engage is such acts of fraud brings me NO rest.

30 posted on 06/19/2012 8:22:23 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PauldArco

RE: Why did these tax cuts have an expiration date?

A little history here...

Bush NEEDED support for his tax cut proposal because the country faced the double whammy of the DOT COM bubble burst ( and recession ) plus the 9/11 attacks (which exacerbated it ).

He was not expecting support from the Dems and he was getting opposition from the likes of John McCain.

Hence here comes the word -— COMPROMISE — was needed.

In Congress, it is always about compromise. In order to get it passed, Bush allowed a sunset provision (otherwise he would find it hard to get it passed in the first place ).

So, the Bush tax cuts had sunset provisions that made them expire at the end of 2010, since otherwise they would fall under the Byrd Rule ( named after the former KKK grand master ). The Byrd Rule is a Senate rule that amends the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to allow Senators, during the Reconciliation Process, to block a piece of legislation if it purports significantly to increase the federal deficit beyond a ten-year term or is otherwise an “extraneous matter” as set forth in the Budget Act.

Most of the tax cuts were scheduled to expire December 31, 2010. Debate over what to do regarding the expiration became a regular issue in the 2004 and 2008 U.S. presidential elections, with Republican candidates generally wanting the cut rates made permanent and Democratic candidates generally advocating for a retention of the lower rates for middle-class incomes but a return to Clinton-era rates for high incomes.

This was resolved during the presidency of Obama by a two-year extension that was part of a larger tax and economic package, the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010.

So here we are -— about to face its expiration next year....


31 posted on 06/19/2012 8:56:56 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (bOTRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb

By allowing the 2003 tax cuts to retire, President “Present” will be increasing the bottom rate from 10% to 15% and the 20% bracket to 25%.

Do the math with me:

Raising the 10% bracket to 15% represents what percentage of increase? Hint: The correct answer is NOT 5%.

Raising the 20% bracket to 25% represents what percentage of increase? Hint: The correct answer, again, is NOT 5%.

Finally, raising the 35% bracket to 39% represents what percentage of increase: Hint: The correct answer is NOT 4%.

Extra credit question: People in which tax bracket will see the largest percentage of increase in their taxes?

Extra extra credit question: People in which tax bracket will see the smallest percentage of increase in their taxes?

To those moving from the 35% to the 39% tax bracket...that’s roughly an 11% increase in taxes.

From 20% to 25%...that’s a full-blown 25% increase in taxes.

To those moving from the 10% bracket to 15%, their taxes will be increased by a whopping 50%.

So the low-income people get their taxes raised even more when seen as a percentage. And the rich folks lose a higher magnitude of money...but the percentage compared to what they already make is lower.


32 posted on 06/19/2012 9:41:48 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Have you heard the joke about Abdul’s goats?

Have you also seen the study that showed that people were willing to accept harm to themselves as long as it harmed “the rich guy”?


33 posted on 06/19/2012 9:54:14 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson