Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Their main problem at this refinery is depending on Crude Oil as an energy source rather than having Natural Gas available. Way too expensive. Cheaper to send the oil to Washington State and ship jet fuel back north than to burn crude oil at North Pole.
1 posted on 06/19/2012 10:52:39 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Thack, I’m surprised you’re allowed on FR.

You always have intelligent factual posts on energy subjects.


2 posted on 06/19/2012 10:56:45 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Maybe when (or if) natural gas comes down from the North Slope, economics will allow the refinery to come back on line.

ExxonMobil set to begin Point Thomson construction {Alaska}

3 posted on 06/19/2012 11:13:52 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

My sister lives in Fairbanks..She was paying 4.59 a gallon for gas just a month ago...

The refinery in North Pole ( a suburb...if you will of Fairbanks) is one of the few in Alaska...

They will have to ship Fuel up to Fairbanks to make up for the loss of the refinery and its gonna cost even more now.


6 posted on 06/19/2012 11:56:02 AM PDT by Rightly Biased (How do you say Arkanicide in Kenyan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

But that’s Government intervention I reckon...


7 posted on 06/19/2012 11:59:13 AM PDT by Rightly Biased (How do you say Arkanicide in Kenyan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson