Skip to comments.
Scott Brown out of debate after Vicki Kennedy rejects demands
boston herald ^
| June 19, 2012
| Hillary Chabot And Chris Cassidy
Posted on 06/19/2012 1:18:37 PM PDT by GQuagmire
Victoria Kennedy has refused to sit out the Scott Brown-Elizabeth Warren race and withhold her endorsement, thus rejecting a debate demand from the Republican senators campaign, prompting Brown to withdraw his agreement to debate, officials tell the Herald today.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Libs lose minds. Film at 11
1
posted on
06/19/2012 1:18:47 PM PDT
by
GQuagmire
To: GQuagmire
The idea that the Kennedy Institute with Brokaw as a moderator would be a neutral debate is ludicrous. I’m no fan of Brown but good for him for not kneeling before the emperor.
To: GQuagmire
Good for Brown! There is NO reason why every debate in America (or ANY debate in America, for that matter) has to be slanted in favor of the Democrats. Are you listening, RNC?
3
posted on
06/19/2012 1:28:49 PM PDT
by
JennysCool
(My hypocrisy goes only so far)
To: GQuagmire
Brown should say he will only debate a real Cherokee.
4
posted on
06/19/2012 1:30:40 PM PDT
by
exit82
To: JennysCool
MSNBC stated they had no knowledge of their involvement. But who elected Vicki to be Rose Kennedy?
5
posted on
06/19/2012 1:31:03 PM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: GQuagmire
Good move by Sen. Brown to decline the farce but let the debates continue...Liawatha vs Real Cherokees.
6
posted on
06/19/2012 1:31:03 PM PDT
by
JPG
(Don't just talk about it, make it happen.)
To: JennysCool
MSNBC stated they had no knowledge of their involvement. But who elected Vicki to be Rose Kennedy?
7
posted on
06/19/2012 1:31:22 PM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: GQuagmire
This isn’t the only “debate,” right? Aren’t there two others?
8
posted on
06/19/2012 1:33:20 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
To: GQuagmire
Extremely clever tactic by Brown to demand a neutral sponsor as a condition to debate.
seems obvious, but look at how Republicans regularly allow themselves to be outmanuvered on debate sponsorship and rules and then get dumped on by supposedly neutral sponsor/moderators.
9
posted on
06/19/2012 1:34:56 PM PDT
by
wildbill
(You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
To: cotton1706
I'm proud of SENATOR Brown for displaying some backbone. I'm a lot more conservative than he is, but I tip my hat to the gentleman for bucking the powerful and corrupt Democrat machine in Massachusetts. Teddy must be running it from the grave. How else could sane people be convinced to vote for for a blonde Marxist claiming special consideration because she thinks her grandmother's high cheekbones make her a Cherokee?
I could not imagine voting for a Kennedy — any Kennedy, drunk or sober — to participate in the governing of the American people, but Elizabeth Warren? She is so stupid it hurts to hear her speak.
10
posted on
06/19/2012 1:45:24 PM PDT
by
July4
(Remember the price paid for your freedom.)
To: July4
Sounds like slogan potential:
When Warren displays cheekbone, Brown displays Backbone.
11
posted on
06/19/2012 1:49:07 PM PDT
by
C210N
("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
To: GQuagmire
Never meet the enemy on their ground under their rules.
Never!
12
posted on
06/19/2012 1:51:19 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(FYBO/FUBO; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
To: C210N
Well, ah, maybe he just turned the other cheek-bone!
To: massgopguy
A kennedy is nothing! F EM Thats pretty much what the Vatican said to them after the coward croaked, and I agree with them
14
posted on
06/19/2012 2:38:39 PM PDT
by
reefdiver
("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
To: GQuagmire
Forget Kennedy, he should demand to be allowed to debate clad only in a loincloth
15
posted on
06/19/2012 2:41:53 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: GQuagmire
Vikki should count herself lucky that:
1. She was not left to drown by her husband.
2. She was not flown into Long Island Sound by her husband.
3. She was not driven to suicide.
4. Cute babysitters did not visit their home.
16
posted on
06/19/2012 3:20:31 PM PDT
by
cicero2k
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson