“LoL. You are always consistently wrong.”
Actually, I’ve been right on 100% of my predictions.
“You may have noticed, if you’re truthful with yourself, that the courts have not truthfully weighed in if Obama is a natural born citizen. They do nothing but evade.”
You mean like this court opinion from Indiana:
“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance
provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the
United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of
the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was]
a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too
were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens.”
Or this one from Georgia:
“For the purposes of this analysis, this Court considered that President BarackObama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen.”
Not that Obama has proven his case that he is a natural born citizen. We know he has not.
You mean like this court opinion from Indiana:
I knew I should have mentioned that pile of pooh in my post above, but I knew that you would poop it out.
We are still awaiting the OBot lawyers to cite that "history making case" in a major case. The Florida case would do, but Klayman should eat it for breakfast and lunch. LoL.
That silly case has been taken apart more than a hyperactive kid playing with a tinker toy. That has to be the most disingenuous case in Indiana law history. The case is so full of crap that it stinks from sea to shining sea.
It cites Chester Aurthur was Pres, and since he got away with his lies, therefore it implies that he's a natural born citizen. LoL. Complete logical fallacy. Or it cites some obscure immigration case because some Carter appointed judge thinks and ("believing" the illegal alien's lawyer no doubt) without citing any legal authority that makes his illegal alien kids natural born. LoL. It's nothing but a clown case and anyone who has an understanding of Ankeny v. the Indiana governor knows that, except you.
Furthermore, Ankeny totally misconstrued and I'd say dishonestly misrepresented Minor. I quote,
“Thus, the Court left open the issue of whether a person who is born within the United States of alien parents is considered a natural born citizen.”
Nooooo Ankeny you foolish judges. The Supreme Court did not leave open the question. Completely false.
The Minor Court avoided the question to “citizenship” of those born to non-citizen parents.
However, they avoided that question by directly construing US Constitution Article 2 Section 1 the natural born citizen clause, and by doing so, the Supreme Court in Minor defined the class of persons who were born in the US to citizen parents as “natural-born citizens”.
That's a called a 'court holding' as it was instrumental to the Supreme Court Minor's opinion. Not like all the bunk we get from OBots who love to cite Wonk Kim Ark dicta and misconstrue even that. LoL.
There are so many holes in that idiotic Indiana Ankeny case it resembles Swiss cheese shot by buckshot.
Or this one from Georgia:
That Administrative GA judge was way over his head and by citing Ankeny, he did not know what he was talking about or he took the easy way out.
Like I said above, and we all do know it, the US judiciary have been cowards on this issue of natural born citizenship.
And we both know the sources cited have been amended with malicious intent. Perhaps by you! You are always consistently wrong. Get your dirt in one sock Sir, even retired a naval officer is supposed to be consistently correct.