Skip to comments.
Democrats to intercept Supreme Court ruling on immigration
Washington Times ^
| 4/24/12
Posted on 06/20/2012 11:43:35 AM PDT by pabianice
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
06/20/2012 11:43:39 AM PDT
by
pabianice
To: pabianice
The States have the right to enforce Federal law even if the Feds are unwilling to do so.
This law would be superfluous and in direct contravention to the 10th Amendment.
2
posted on
06/20/2012 11:47:41 AM PDT
by
rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
To: pabianice
Obviously, Chuckie, the Feds are refusing to uphold the laws. I guess we can pick and choose which laws we want to obey .. or not.
That’s the problem with lawlessness.
3
posted on
06/20/2012 11:47:59 AM PDT
by
Reagan69
(I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
To: pabianice
Chucky has a REAL problem with understanding how a Federal System is suppose to work. 50 different answers is a GOOD THING - Kind of like natural selection. The best answers become obvious, then can be copied.
This boy needs a lesson!
To: pabianice
but Democrats are already preparing for a potential loss by saying theyll try to pass legislation stripping states of the power to enact their own immigration rules. Dead in the water quicker than you can said "epic FAIL."
5
posted on
06/20/2012 11:51:12 AM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
To: rarestia
I think he should go back to worrying about and legislating wire grill cleaning brushes.
To: pabianice
I believe it is simply too damaging to our economy and too dangerous to our democracy to have 50 states doing 50 different things with regard to immigration policy,
So, would the same apply to sugary drink policy, Chuckles?
7
posted on
06/20/2012 12:10:51 PM PDT
by
chrisser
(Starve the Monkeys!)
To: pabianice
I would like to hear any evidence there has ever been a more incompetent and disastrous presidential administration than this one. They believe they are bigger than the law. In their mind, anyone who disagrees must be destroyed. This includes citizens, judges, and foreign leaders. November cannot come soon enough.
8
posted on
06/20/2012 12:15:03 PM PDT
by
ilgipper
( November cannot come soon enough)
To: pabianice
Makes sense. They can’t let the Supreme Court stand in the way of Democrat voter-recruitment efforts.
To: pabianice
Chuckie is the head clown on the Hill who refuses to comply with the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. He thinks that he has the power to take away the powers reserved to the people in the Constitution. Chuckie has been practicing this lawless power grab behavior for so long now that he behaves like a crazed heroin junkie scheming for his next fix.
To: pabianice
saying theyll try to pass legislation stripping states of the power to enact their own immigration rules. Why bother, when an Executive Order will do?
11
posted on
06/20/2012 1:48:05 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(About that Coup d'état we had in 08, anyone worried yet?)
To: pabianice
Schmuckie, your bill won’t even pass the Senate, never mind the House.
12
posted on
06/20/2012 2:36:03 PM PDT
by
HenpeckedCon
(What pi$$es me off the most is that POS commie will get a State Funeral!)
To: pabianice
WASHINGTONA House committee voted to sanction Attorney General Eric Holder with contempt of Congress, escalating a standoff between Republicans and the Obama administration over documents about a botched gun-trafficking operation. When Chuckie or the mediots say "our democracy," they mean collectivized power belonging to them.
13
posted on
06/20/2012 3:04:47 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
To: pabianice
The Federal Government is, and has been remiss in their handling of one of their primary duties. What the “H” do we need the Federal Government for if they can’t handle the job they were created by the Founders to perform?
Everything beyond protection of our borders, and managing our economics, which they are also remiss is superfluous Leftist nonsense created over many years with centralizing our government as goal that needs to be eliminated, or sent to the States for their consideration as to whether they even want to bother with it.
Shrink the Federal Government by eliminating all of the Leftist Centralizing departments they created, and fire every person involved in every bureaucracy that exists to support those departments.
14
posted on
06/20/2012 3:18:23 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
15
posted on
06/20/2012 3:33:01 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Reagan69
yup, when the government is arbitrary in what laws it enforces, i will be just as arbitrary as to which laws i will obey...
16
posted on
06/20/2012 4:39:47 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: pabianice
I believe it is simply too damaging to our
economy voting bloc and too dangerous to our
democracy ability to have illegal aliens vote for us to have
50 states doing 50 different things anyone do anything with regard to immigration policy
Fixed it for ya, Chuck.
17
posted on
06/20/2012 4:53:28 PM PDT
by
Personal Responsibility
(Behind enemy lines in the city where it's illegal to buy a Big Gulp)
To: ilgipper
And they’re getting worse at time goes on. I thought Demonrats were hypocrites and fools decades ago, yet never did I think they would be this effed up.
18
posted on
06/20/2012 5:14:27 PM PDT
by
A_Former_Democrat
(Free the Zimmermans. . . end this political, racist travesty of a "prosecution")
To: A_Former_Democrat
They merely reflect a large segment of the population
19
posted on
06/20/2012 8:21:01 PM PDT
by
arrogantsob
(Obama must Go.)
To: pabianice
The Supreme Court hears arguments Wednesday over Arizonas immigration-crackdown law, but Democrats are already preparing for a potential loss by saying theyll try to pass legislation stripping states of the power to enact their own immigration rules. I doubt that the Senate would ever pass such a bill; and the probability of its doing so would be further diminished if the GOP were to take control of the upper chamber next January, as it very well could.
And, even if this proposed bill were (somehow) to pass the Senate, it would surely be a no-go in the House...
20
posted on
06/20/2012 8:25:32 PM PDT
by
AmericanExceptionalist
(Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson