[Sirius Lee]

How seriously can we take this link if the writer is so inept?

To lose phase in public like that...how embarrassing!

[Matchett-PI]

MHGinTN: "‘Cosmic Evolution: It’s Just a Going Through a Face’ ... should ‘face’ be phase? How seriously can we take this link if the writer is so inept?"

Sirius Lee: "To lose phase in public like that...how embarrassing!"

No. "Face" can't be "phase", unless you're a flatlander, which is what would really be embarrassing.

Face of the Deep

<>

"This may not be something you've ever considered before, but just as there can be no mind in the absence of a person, there can be no person in the absence of the face. You have to be "able to draw out the metaphysical and theological implications. .."

<>

"...time -- and evolution -- create new and higher -- which is to say, more "dense" and "deep" -- unities. .."

<>

"..for Christianity, the convergence of person and cosmos, of anthropology and cosmology, is the end of "the world."

<>

"..the cosmos and man are not two clearly separable quantities, with the cosmos forming the fortuitous scene of human existence, which in itself could be parted from the cosmos and allowed to accomplish itself without a world."

<>

Human beings are oriented to meaning, period, and are epistemophilic to the core. Which is why deep down we are depthless.