Posted on 06/20/2012 5:42:42 PM PDT by Kevin in California
While watching the leprecaun and Morris debate tonight regarding the Holder contemp hearing, the leprecaun told Morris if the House vote next week finds Holder in contempt, it'll be nothing more than an embararrasment for him as there are no mechanisms in place to prosecute Holder as he's pretty much not prosecute himself.
However, while listening to Levin on the way home from work earlier, Levin said the house can add some sort of notes to the vote in which they could seek an outside Fed court to make Holder turn over the docs the OC (Issa) is demanding.
If I were to venture a guess on who's correct, I'd take Levin over the leprecaun.
Harvard does seem rather enamored of faux oppression narratives (both Obama and Elizabeth Warren being cases in point), but the relevant institution here is the University of Chicago, where Obama “served” as stint as an adjunct lecturer on Constitutional law, also on the basis of affirmative action, rather than any actual attainment in the field.
Similar to: "Does daylight occur during the day or at night?"
Who the hell is O’Reilly? Oh, you mean that Fox News idiot...
Without even knowing the topic of discussion I would bet the farm on Levin. As a matter of fact, the list of people I would side with over BOR is quite long.
Levin worked in the attorney general’s office under Reagan.
Before reading the question, I wouldn’t believe Oh’Really? if he said the Sun would rise in the East.
Mark Levin tends to know what he’s talking about. Oh’Really? tends to talk on things he knows nothing about.
I know. I was just making a point how stupid BOR is by saying
he could not pass a Bar exam even if he had the answers in hand. That’s how stupid BOR is.
Levin is a very good litigator. O’Reilly is a very bad bs artist. No contest here.
A normal person would be embarrassed to be as ill-informed as O’Reilly. I am constantly amazed at his ignorance on all subjects.
Of course - not even close there! Earlier today, I heard either Judge Napolitano or Jay Sekulow talk about the various possible scenarios, one or two of which involved withHolder being jailed. He could also end up in the same federal court that he had Roger Clemens tried in. Sweet.
That is true and applies only to members of the House. No one else, not even civilians.
“O’Reilly is always right,never wrong and he tells you that evvvvverrrry single night ,ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ”
LOL I am often stunned at his lack of depth. Seriously. He makes shallow judgements without really thinking things through or doing his homework on any given subject. It’s embarrassing, but then that is probably the reason so many Democrats watch him.
LepreCON. He’s a PHONEY.
I’m not sure what simple sentence you are proposing was misunderstood. The power of Congress to imprison those found in contempt of Congress is not limited to members of the house in question.
I refer you to the finding in Jurney v. MacCracken in which the Supreme Court denied the habeas corpus petition of William P. MacCracken, Jr. and allowed the Senate to imprison him for ten days for allowing the destruction of subpoenaed documents. Mr. MacCracken was a lawyer and former Commerce Department official, not a Senator.
Conclusive fact, Bill O’Reilly is a gas bag who loves the sound only of his own voice. He asks excellent guests softball open ended questions, then interrupts them to answer his own question. Again and again. Wasted quest tonight Charles Krauthammer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.