Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Green-Jobs Fraud Exposed
IBD Editorials ^ | June 21, 2012 | Editor

Posted on 06/21/2012 5:49:46 PM PDT by Kaslin

Industrial Policy: For a $9 billion investment, the administration created just over 900 new, permanent jobs. We could've had 20,000 jobs building a pipeline with not a dollar of taxpayer money being wasted.

According to the report by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, which is part of the U.S. Department of Energy, Section 1503 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka the stimulus), the part that covers green energy projects got some $9 billion in stimulus cash for 2009-11 and created a whopping 910 direct jobs — those involved in the ongoing operation of the wind and solar projects that were funded.

Now, the report doesn't come right out and say this. You have to pick through it and look past the "indirect" jobs said to have been created by the manufacture and installation of the bird-chopping wind turbines and water-cleansed solar panels.

The administration has a most curious way of describing what a green job is, but if you count just the "direct" jobs, it cost taxpayers $9.8 million to create each of those long-term jobs.

Throw in the indirect jobs supporting the direct jobs estimate of 4,600 (we're confused too) and there are 5,510 total jobs (direct and indirect). Starting with the $9 billion in grants, the result to establish 5,510 jobs averages out to $1.63 million per job.

In an attempt to make things look not quite so wasteful, the report in its summary claims that for the 2009-11 time frame, there were an average 52,000-75,000 "direct and indirect jobs per year" created for the construction, installation and related work on the wind and solar projects

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: energy; greenfraud; greenjobs; greenscam; ibd; ibdenergy; keystonexl; pipeline; solyndra; stimulus

1 posted on 06/21/2012 5:49:50 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A bilkng of billions of dollars that only a shakedown artist from cook county like obama could pull off. I can see obama giving the middle finger salute and saying: “thanks for the cash, suckers!”.


2 posted on 06/21/2012 6:15:44 PM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Darrell Issa explores the Obama administration definition of Green Jobs

"If you sweep the floor in a solar panel facility, is that a Green Job?"
--Yes

"If you drive a hybrid bus, is that a Green Job?"
--Yes

"If you're a college professor teaching environmental studies, is that a Green Job?"
--Yes

"If you put gas in a hybrid bus, is that a Green Job?"
--Yes

"What about a clerk at a bicycle dealer?"
--Yes

"Is someone who works at an antique dealer in a Green Job?"
--Yes

""Do garbage men have Green Jobs?"
--Yes

""Do oil lobbyists have Green Jobs?"
--Yes

3 posted on 06/21/2012 9:15:42 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Thank God for Congressman Issa.


4 posted on 06/21/2012 9:38:58 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is, it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Closing down the nuclear industry in the 1980s cost one million jobs, and probably trillions of dollars transferred to Middle Eastern potentates.


5 posted on 06/22/2012 12:14:11 AM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

Green scam ping


6 posted on 06/22/2012 6:28:23 AM PDT by raptor22 (Join me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

The 1603 “Cash Grant” program was a distortion of the otherwise successful PTC (production tax credit). 1603 allowed for projects to apply for ~30% of the upfront capital costs in the form of a grant instead of actually earning it back over time based on successful energy production: the PTC. This allowed for many sub-par wind farms to be build in low wind areas where the economics would not have been justified by relying on the PTC.


7 posted on 06/22/2012 6:35:48 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson