You’re relying on a logical fallacy instead of actual Supreme Court precedence. A series and sum of Minor errors (pun intended) don’t make those errors correct. The Supreme Court cited Minor in Luria v. United States and NOT Wong Kim Ark as has been cited in error by Ankeny, which was then cited in error by some administrative law judges. At least 27 Supreme Court justices agreed on a definition of NBC that inherently precludes Obama from being constitutionally eligible for office. Rogers helped prove this for me, the idiot. A handful of administrative judges doesn’t outweigh that precedent. An no one said anything about a conspiracy or paranoia, so drop the strawman nonsense. For a self-declared “realist,” that is a bunch of fantasy.
You seem educated and full of words. You have taken a position that is out of the mainstream. Why don’t you set this “realist” straight. Show me where it is written (other than in the far recess of your mind) that to be president your parents must be U.S. citizens unless born overseas (as in the case of McShame)?
I deal in facts and reality, not dreams. I know for a fact that you don’t need two citizen parents if you are born on U.S. soil to be eligible for president; that is a rule you have devised in your head because you don’t like our present shithead president; that is a rule that you get confused with U.S. citizens bearing children overseas. Show me the rule that says that you need citizen parents when born on U.S. soil. You won’t and you can’t. EPIC FAIL!