“All Internet sources have been abridged with malicious intent to subvert the Constitution and the law. Use a law library and printed books published prior to 2007. YOU will find no ambiguity or misunderstanding. the meaning is very clear, natural born is born on US soil of two US citizen parents.”
False. The US Supreme Court citations on the Internet are NOT different than what someone would find if they went and saw a paper copy. When you have to claim a giant conspiracy has obliterated all record of what people actually wrote for the last 200 years, you are deep in weirdo-nutjob land!
BTW - I’m a retired Lt Col.
Question: Did the NY Supreme Court declare Lynch a natural born citizen in 1844? And did the US Supreme Court discuss NBC & NBS in detail in 1898?
Do you really think that “natural born” wasn’t a part of English law for hundreds of years prior to the US Constitution?
yep a Shill for Obama. You are still wrong!
No. Lynch was decided by the first circuit court of New York.
And did the US Supreme Court discuss NBC & NBS in detail in 1898?
Yes, it made several distinctions between these two terms, the former was defined in Minor v. Happersett exclusively as all children born in the country to citizen parents. The discussion of NBS was used to justify a separate class of birth citizenship defined only by the 14th amendment applicable to resident aliens who had to have permanent residence and domicil. Obama fails to meet all of these citizenship definitions.