[New Jersey Realist]

There is no applicable precedent in Minor.

The recent Arizona eligibility case denies your precedent wherein it states:

"Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co., 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President.

See United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 702-03(1898) (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV);

Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678,684-88 (Ind. App. 2010) (addressing the precise issue).

Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett ,88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.”

Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/84531299/AZ-2012-03-07-Allen-v-Obama-C20121317-ORDER-Dismissing-Complaint

I'm no obammy fan, I absolutely detest the bastard, but with all due respect Chief, our efforts can be better spent deposing this guy while not sounding like a far right fringe lunatic.

[W. W. SMITH]

When you use printed material in a law library you will find that Minor v Happersett did establish precedent.