[trailhkr1]

ah... tattooes... the sure sign of a scank.

Maybe in the old days..it's accepted today..more of a sign if individuality today..that sort of thing.

I know numerous women with them and they are far from skanks.

[bgill]

Accepted? What, just like in the “old days” before BJ when a Lewinsky was a sex act? If I ran a business I'd never hire anyone who had visible tats. They're nasty looking and unprofessional. If I found out later they had unseen tats, I'd question their judgment.

Now days or the old days, tattoos are skanky. Why anyone would put something permanent on their bodies when they insist on having more changes of clothes than can possibly be worn in a lifetime is ridiculous. They have to have a new outfit every other day and cringe at wearing something that they think went out of fashion six months ago. Changing in and out of a tattoo every other day when they get tired of it isn't so easy. And, yeah, in 20 years nothing will look like a cute little butterfly.

[TexasFreeper2009]

Here's the deal.

Society has gone down hill, bigtime. So of course tattoos are more common.

Everything depraved is more common, that doesn't make it any more acceptable.

Just think of the scummiest thing that you think a person could do... now imagine a future where that action is “common” and “acceptable” (at least among those that do it) .... now does the fact that most people do that action make is ok?

not in my book.