To: UB355; Lancey Howard; scram2; DTogo
Because if the ruling is against state rights, and for federal power, the inclination may be to rule the same way for health care.
Of course, I hope I am wrong.
124 posted on
06/25/2012 8:11:39 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: redgolum
"Because if the ruling is against state rights, and for federal power, the inclination may be to rule the same way for health care. That occurred to me at first, but the huge difference (even for this court) is that immigration has traditionally been an area of federal jurisdiction. It's power in health care has never been as great.
232 posted on
06/25/2012 10:06:58 AM PDT by
In Maryland
( "... the [Feds] must live with the inconvenient fact that it is a Union of independent States)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson