Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UB355; Lancey Howard; scram2; DTogo

Because if the ruling is against state rights, and for federal power, the inclination may be to rule the same way for health care.

Of course, I hope I am wrong.


124 posted on 06/25/2012 8:11:39 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: redgolum
"Because if the ruling is against state rights, and for federal power, the inclination may be to rule the same way for health care.

That occurred to me at first, but the huge difference (even for this court) is that immigration has traditionally been an area of federal jurisdiction. It's power in health care has never been as great.

232 posted on 06/25/2012 10:06:58 AM PDT by In Maryland ( "... the [Feds] must live with the inconvenient fact that it is a Union of independent States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson