how sad.... /sarc
a person wouldn't be allowed to walk in with a full-face helmet and not remove it
1 posted on
06/25/2012 7:36:40 AM PDT by
Cronos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: Cronos
They’re such proud people, that’s why they throw a bag over their wife’s head every chance they get.
To: Cronos
How do we know she's forty? Is she allowed to disclose her age? And that she should be allowed to expose those eyes and hands. How un-islamic.
One would think her husband would be horse-whipped at the mosque for even allowing his wife to undertake anything related to the education of his progeny.
Though she just needs to bide her time. Soon sharia will replace British society altogether, and some scraggly faced imam will see to that she gets hers. And that he gets his.
30 posted on
06/25/2012 8:42:26 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: Cronos
Lets be honest! The niqab is BSDM fetish sex wear! Its no different than those wacky pervs walking around in latex body suits with dog collars on. It removes a woman's identity, reduces her to being an object, and is a freaky badge of her obedience and submission. Moslem fetish sex wear has no place in public.
34 posted on
06/25/2012 9:21:33 AM PDT by
Casie
To: Cronos
And suppose I was unable to get service at my local bank because I refused to remove my hat and dark glasses . . . cry me a river.
39 posted on
06/25/2012 1:33:00 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson