Poll to FReep:The Supreme Court struck down much of Arizona’s immigration law, SB-1070

KVOA TV TUcson, AZ ^ | 6-25-2012 | KVOA TV TUcson, AZ

[AZ .44 MAG]

The Supreme Court struck down much of Arizona’s immigration law, SB-1070, but upheld the controversial provision that would require police to question people’s immigration status if officers have reasonable suspicion they’re here illegally. What do you think of the Supreme Court’s decision?

I agree with the decision, The entire law should have been upheld, The entire law should have been struck down.

[AZ .44 MAG]

The Supreme Court struck down much of Arizona’s immigration law, SB-1070, but upheld the controversial provision that would require police to question people’s immigration status if officers have reasonable suspicion they’re here illegally. What do you think of the Supreme Court’s decision?

I agree with the decision 16 votes 26.2%
The entire law should have been upheld 28 votes 45.9%
The entire law should have been struck down 17 votes 27.9%

Poll is here a little way down on the right.

Related article: Reactions to Supreme Court's SB1070 ruling. You’ll probably want to skip the predictable cries of racism from 0h0m0 and the other DemocRATS.

[AZ .44 MAG]

This is gonna get a whole bunch of Libtards all wee-weed up.

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

I'll be handling the Poll Freeping pings while Dynachrome's gone. Errors and omissions are all mine until the handoff when he returns.

[CitizenM]

The Supreme Court struck down much of Arizona’s immigration law, SB-1070, but upheld the controversial provision that would require police to question people’s immigration status if officers have reasonable suspicion they’re here illegally. What do you think of the Supreme Court’s decision?

I agree with the decision - 21 votes 12.7%

The entire law should have been upheld - 118 votes 71.1%

The entire law should have been struck down - 27 votes 16.3%

At 3:15 P.M. Eastern time

[arrogantsob]

Study the decision then modify the law to accommodate the Court’s objections. Rinse, lather, repeat.

[moose07]

173 votes....

[AZ .44 MAG]

Bears repeating.

Study the decision then modify the law to accommodate the Court’s objections. Rinse, lather, repeat.

[The Sons of Liberty]

It is nice to voice our opinion by freeping a poll, and 79% of those polled believe that Arizona had the right to enact and enforce laws within their borders to exclude foreign invaders, but what good do they do? Obviously those in government - congress, the courts, every one of them, answer to someone else but the people. They have forgotten that:

They derive their power from the consent of the governed!

[AZ .44 MAG]

If the poll publishers get the results they want then they use those results to make news with.

By pushing the results the other way it either takes that option away from them or dilutes the effectiveness of that technique.

I agree with your assessment of our government.

[Hunton Peck]

I agree with the decision
26 votes 7.3%

The entire law should have been upheld
285 votes 80.3%

The entire law should have been struck down
44 votes 12.4%

[jimt]

Freeped and bumped.

[Iron Munro]

Latest results:

I agree with the decision = 48 votes 7.6%

The entire law should have been upheld = 519 votes 82.1%

The entire law should have been struck down = 65 votes 10.3%