Posted on 06/27/2012 2:05:32 PM PDT by djf
In this case the “east coast” would extend to the Alleghenies or maybe beyond
We saw in Japan what tsunamis did inland as they traveled up the rivers
As an asside, the length of the fault movement also contributes to any possible tsunami and while the land movement in the Canary Islands would be more pronounced than in Japan’s quake the length of the disturbance would be far smaller. It would be more like a pebble dropped in a pond. A lesser volume of water would be displaced. In short, I quite agree with you about the potential and reasons behind your argument.
Isn’t there a similar threat to the West Coast from a large part of the big island of Hawaii crashing into the Pacific due to volcanic/earthquake activity?
Probably not, due to the distance and the direction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.