Pelosi sees Roberts helping uphold U.S. healthcare law

Reuters ^ | June 27, 2012 | Thomas Ferraro

[Deagle]

I worry that this ruling may be the end of government. If the Supreme Court rules for Obamacare, then it will be the start of a Revolution. It does not take much common sense to see that this ruling would be wrong and not only against our Constitution, but an affirmative ruling would mean that the Constitution no longer exists! I expect no such ruling however - surely the judges are smarter that we are.

We shall see...

[wvguy]

Is that a purse Steny Hoyer is carrying? For Nancy?

It's held by someone to the right of Steny.

[tenger]

And that photo should be plastered all over when the NewsReaders say “don’t gloat” if it’s overturned. I won’t gloat any larger than SanFranNan.

[Robert357]

6-3 in favor;

Nancy ARE YOU SERIOUS?

ARE YOU SERIOUS!

What part of the Constitution give Congress the power to implement an insurance mandate?

[LostInBayport]

Excellent point. Drudge should put that photo over a link to the first “tea party gloats and that’s just wrong” screed from some lefty at NYT or MSLSD.

[workerbee]

An even better question: Who is they guy he is holding hands with - and why is he holding hands with a guy, while carrying a ladies purse?

Yep, that's Steny Please-Ma'am-May-I-Carry-Your-Purse Hoyer, and he's holding the hand of Elijah Cummings. Both these "men" are, I'm embarrassed to say, representatives of my state of Maryland. Both will almost certainly be employed for life, given their constituencies.

[depressed in 06]

It would be a travesty if this were the only thing she is correct about.

[TLI]

when it goes down they will paint Roberts as a racist...

They paint everything as racist.

It's the only "color" they have got.

.

[uncbob]

She used 6-3 last week , too. That makes me suspicious that she got leaked info.

Me too

even ditzy Nancy would not go out on a limb with a prediction like that without some assurance

[mike_9958]

“I never cared for Dole — or McCain either — in their politics, but Mitt Romney isn’t worthy to shine their shoes.”

Whatever.... if you’re not voting for Republican candidate you are voting for the Democrat - Obama... simple.

Don’t vote Obama

[jayrunner]

Looks like a lynch mob~

[beaversmom]

What was Rush saying about Roberts?

[Ann Archy]

right....he was old.

[Lazamataz]

Ok, Madam BizzaroWorld, today we get to see: Are you a ranting lunatic, or are you a ranting lunatic who happened to be correct about the ruling today?

[tacticalogic]

If he does, it will be the second time the republic was betrayed by a SC justice named Roberts, the first being Owen.

[skeeter]

Rush was saying he wouldn't be surprised if Roberts started making flaky votes, given what he had learned about him. He refused to elaborate.

Perhaps Rush was referring to to SB1070 vote only, I don't know.

[Robert357]

Well Nancy, it was not 6-3, but you were right.

I guess you really are a constitutional scholar, just like Dear Leader.

I am so depressed at the Supreme Court decision, but have to admit that you were right and I was wrong. Who would have thought......

[mojito]

Obviously somebody tipped off Nan.