>If the word “tax” is not in the bill, how can the Supreme Court deem a fee a tax—a tax which forces you to buy a product as a condition of your liberty? That is unprecedented.
You can tax an activity or an item you posses, but you cannot use a tax to force commerce, and then take away a person’s libert as a means to force that commerce.
I don’t know how you reconcile the mandate does not work under the commerce clause and then say the taxing power can be used to create commerce.
This is complete bullsh!t.<
That’s what is so confusing, but remember, this thing is such a behemoth of a bill that the language calling the mandate a tax could have been hidden in the depths heaven knows where.
Remember Pelousy told us they’d have to pass the darn thing before anyone would know what was in it.
Still waiting on Myth...statement??? Nada...my next guess, he is going to try and fanagle ObamaCare to RomneyCare (I thougt of it first!!!)
And on the topic of the spineless...wasnt Boehner “ready” with all kinds Bills??? Boehner...hold Holder in Contempt before lunch and work on REPEALING this after lunch...
Where is the leadership of the Rs?