Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Gamgee
Why does he have to explain anything?

He was right the individual mandate is not constitutional based on the commerce clause.

Like most Americans, including most Republicans, he supports "major goals" of the bill but talks about it being flawed and in need of repeal and replacement.

He has basic credibility that the issue matters to him (good for not scaring moderates) in ways no other Republican really does because he did do RomneyCare.

58 posted on 06/28/2012 2:17:38 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey
Like the RINO he is he has no credibility as you said - he sees the bill as salvageable, and likely will NOT repeal it.
61 posted on 06/28/2012 4:25:06 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson