Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
I understand your point but it's not Robert's job to make us eat our peas; it's his job to determine the Constitutionality of that flaming heap of dung known as Obamacare. He could have voted the way he should have and then made a public statement excoriating the Congress for continually playing the SCOTUS game against the people with their contemptuous legislation.
232 posted on 06/29/2012 4:33:27 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: liberalh8ter
As I've said several times in the last 24 hours:

I believe ObamaCare is unconstitutional. I'll bet Chief Justice Roberts thinks it's unconstitutional, too. It's just that it's unconstitutional on grounds that were not the basis of the legal action that was brought in this specific case.

I predict it's going to be declared unconstitutional (if it even survives that long) on other grounds in a future court case that will be brought after more and more of the provisions of ObamaCare are implemented. The constitutionality of these provisions were never argued in this case because most of them haven't even been implemented yet.

I also predict that Chief Justice John Roberts is going to write the majority opinion in the case overturning ObamaCare. Yesterday's ruling brought him a whole lot of credibility to do this, I'd say.

236 posted on 06/29/2012 4:59:23 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson