And the forensic accountant today testified that all the moneys were accounted for and there was no deception in the bank transfers. And there was nothing illegal about any of those financial transfers.
The state may have wanted it to be about deceiving the court, but it's not Shellie on trial but George.
In a bond hearing, the strength of the state's case is a part of the bond determination and today the illusion of the state's case came apart -- big time. If these things were not supposed to be part of the bond hearing, then why did the judge allow them and the prosecution fail to object, and all these things damning to the state's case become part of the court record???