Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dewawi
Really? What do the smart people say about whether Roberts comments on the Commerce Clause are unbinding dicta? How do the smart people justify Roberts finding a “tax” where none was claimed? And what sort of “tax” did Roberts find it to be? Eh n00b?
53 posted on 06/29/2012 6:13:22 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: MileHi
What do the smart people say about whether Roberts comments on the Commerce Clause are unbinding dicta?

Is there any basis for regarding any part of a court decision as being "binding" on anyone but the actual parties to the case before it? To be sure, if the Supreme Court implies that it will overturn at first opportunity any future lower-court decisions which violate certain principles, then it's in most cases reasonable for lower-court judges to avoid issuing such decisions; the Court thus has some implicit authority to instruct lower courts what rules to follow, but only to the extent they are willing to follow it.

66 posted on 06/29/2012 9:59:40 PM PDT by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson