Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gusopol3

Here’s the chess: Roberts officially made this a tax. Well, when the IRS tries to collect the tax, the issue of procedural due process will come into play due to the waivers (equal protection), and the Court will strike it down then. But wait, the waivers have been issued, you say? True, but they don’t do anything procedurally yet.

It’s a Texas two-step. The “win” is illusory.


29 posted on 07/01/2012 12:50:53 PM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: piytar

Bottom line, the ruling hurts Obama. A rejection would have hurt him , too. But upholding on the commerce clause would have helped him. IMO.


32 posted on 07/01/2012 12:54:52 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: piytar
NIce try but no cigar. If you can get away with calling a penalty a tax, and justify it in the name of "limiting" government, then you can do anything you want. No, there's no rescue coming from the Court. They're done.

Besides, if Roberts had such a clever strategem up his sleeve, why not tip off his conservative colleagues? Instead he alienated his allies on the court for nothing, when all he really had to do was the right thing and vote it down. Why go through risky gyrations to achieve the same end?

The whole thing makes no sense unless he caved. For god knows what reason.

162 posted on 07/01/2012 2:56:05 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson