Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee; jazusamo; P-Marlowe; Alamo-Girl; Perdogg
History will show that Roberts' decision was the Enabling Tyranny Act.

And Arizona was called "At Presidential Whim" Act. (You can't enforce law if the president is having a hissy fit and not doing his job.)

Combined, they are "The Nero/Caligula Acts"

76 posted on 07/03/2012 9:52:19 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; AuH2ORepublican; Don_B
I agree, however, I wish someone will explain to me the different positions Scalia has taken over the use of both the supremacy clause and the commerce clause.

In South Dakota v Dole and Gonzales v Raich he sided with the Federal Govt in case using both sumpremacy and commerce respectively. It appears that Justice O'Connor got Dole correctly.
77 posted on 07/03/2012 10:17:24 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson