Think his title question was rhetorical ?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Para-Ord.45
Or force every gun owner to buy gun liability insurance or pay a Pax (Penalty/Tax).
2 posted on
07/02/2012 11:32:43 AM PDT by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: Para-Ord.45
I wish several dozen Democrats WOULD PROPOSE this....it’ll make for easy Republican pickups next election. :)
To: Para-Ord.45
The Feds already require a $200 BATF Tax Stamp to buy an automatic weapon. Nothing about raising revenue about this...it is pure and simple a behavior modification ruse to find out who owns machine guns. And this was passed during in the 1930’s and never challenged because they called it a tax. What’s the difference?
4 posted on
07/02/2012 11:35:16 AM PDT by
mick
(Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
To: Para-Ord.45
I wonder if we will see another spike in gun and ammo sales.
6 posted on
07/02/2012 11:42:16 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: Para-Ord.45
I remember that clunker from Moynihan, along with anything over 500 rounds is an arsenal.
500 rounds is a good day at the range!
Moynihan really started drinking the Kool Aid after 1990. Leftist dementia?
7 posted on
07/02/2012 11:45:41 AM PDT by
Fred Hayek
(The Democratic Party is the operational wing of CPUSA.)
To: Para-Ord.45
They sure can. And worthless, corrupt politicians can get
UN-ELECTED too.
Bring it on!
8 posted on
07/02/2012 11:47:30 AM PDT by
The Duke
To: Para-Ord.45
We have already seen doctors asking their patients if they own any firearms. Watch what happens under collectivist deathcare.
9 posted on
07/02/2012 11:48:57 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: Para-Ord.45
IIRC a left wing loon state or city tried to tax ammo around 300% and it was struck down without even getting to SCOTUS as violating the 2ND as an infringement.
The ruling means you can force people to buy a gun and ammo or pay a tax.
10 posted on
07/02/2012 11:49:58 AM PDT by
IMR 4350
To: Para-Ord.45
11 posted on
07/02/2012 11:50:10 AM PDT by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is, it is the only answer.)
To: Para-Ord.45
I don’t know why not. In 09 the tax on loose cigarette tobacco rose by 2300%.
As far as I’m concerned we should pass all the taxes imposed directly on to a consumer paid sales tax at the point of retail sale. After all, the consumer is already paying all the taxes imposed on the manufacturers anyway. Might as well let the consumer see the taxes they’re paying all the way down the line.
13 posted on
07/02/2012 11:54:22 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Para-Ord.45
Or... abortions, newspapers, movies, porn, college tuition, ect.
Of course, we can provide waivers to who we see fit, just like Obama does.
The air has the feeling of 1859 to it.
14 posted on
07/02/2012 11:56:14 AM PDT by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: Para-Ord.45
Then, it would be time to bring back the bow and the sword.
20 posted on
07/02/2012 12:14:31 PM PDT by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: Para-Ord.45
Didn’t Pat Moynahan (sp?) propose that back in the 1990s?
His idea was to tax ammo so high that people couldn’t afford it.
Don’t bet that this can’t or won’t be on their minds.
22 posted on
07/02/2012 12:15:00 PM PDT by
History Repeats
(If Obama had a son, he'd have his picture hanging on the wall of the Post office wanted board.)
To: Para-Ord.45
If they do, lets give them our ammo. From the business end.
To: Para-Ord.45
As long as they don’t charge the tax...retroactively. ;~)
24 posted on
07/02/2012 12:18:57 PM PDT by
moovova
To: Para-Ord.45
They can tax anything they want now. You’ll be paying property tax out of the ying-yang for your firearms—if you can afford it. They found the golden key.
25 posted on
07/02/2012 12:23:24 PM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: Para-Ord.45
Once the government carries people either by subsidies for private insurance or they become the single payer plan, then it will happen.
Anything that the government says is a "health risk", they will tax it sky high. The government will say you have the freedom to buy ice cream, tobacco, or ammunition, but because of the "health risks" associated with it, it will have such high taxes with it that it will become unaffordable.
They can easily call a box of ammo a heath risk, and since they pay for health costs, they need to tax it higher. They will say that the people that practice unhealthy lifestyles must pay a higher tax than those that lead a healthy lifestyle.
The tax percentage on ammunition will probably be much higher than the percentage they put on tobacco. The percentage will match their hatred for it.
28 posted on
07/02/2012 12:26:07 PM PDT by
GregoTX
(Federalist)
To: Para-Ord.45
I think we have now established that the Federal government can pretty much tax whatever the hell it wants to tax, because it now freely ignores restrictions on its power as imposed by Constitutional enumeration. The government cannot force you to buy something, but it can tax you if you do, or if you do not.
But I am relatively certain that if the cost of a box of, say, .45ACP ammunition suddenly went from $19.95 to $1,995.00, those responsible would eventually see a great deal of such ammunition. But not in the stores.
34 posted on
07/02/2012 12:46:53 PM PDT by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Para-Ord.45
yep...but only if you have ammo inside you, inserted by outside force, and you visit a hospital for said ammo to be removed and you have no insurance.
37 posted on
07/02/2012 1:00:14 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(Obama - The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance)
To: Para-Ord.45
They can try, but it’d be a silly way for them to commit suicide.
39 posted on
07/02/2012 1:28:43 PM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson