[VanDeKoik]

I’m starting to wonder about some of these posters.

Romney was not even my 3rd choice, but I’m not actively spending time trying to defeat him rather than Obama.

All they are doing is trying to find anything to back up their narrative, even if it takes hyperventilating op-eds from no-name bloggers posted repeatedly through the day.

And what is their point? They offer no Plan B other than feeling superior in their philosophy. They certainly offer no other action other than some fantasy “brokered convention” event or staying home to “teach them a lesson” or maybe some nobody 3rd party guy nominated at a convention held in a Holiday Inn.

Hmmmm seems like noting about Obama again. It’s all about defeating Romney as their TOP priority.

[Mamzelle]

In 2008 I voted for Romney in the primary over McCain. I guess that must have meant I liked him better than McCain? Yet I voted for McCain after almost ten years of posting on FR saying I'd nevernevernever vote for McCain.

I love Palin. I was crushed when she declined to run.

Life is tough that way.

This time around I voted for Gingrich, but I didn't get him. I wasn't even that happy about Gingrich, and I expected Romney to win, so I voted for Newt in hopes that Romney would pay attention to that vote.

I get called paranoid, but really, how much money would it take to pay some Daily Show-watching losers to go to conservative sites and start posting discouraging words? Seems pretty cheap when they're got billions in Soros money.

[paudio]

I wouldn't go so far as acusing them of being paid by Soros & Co. I think it's more about ego: to feel superior and earn the right to say, "I told you so". So, they do have interest in 0bama reelection. Since they don't see any difference between 0bama and Romney in the first place, a Romney lost would at least mean something for them.