[Poser]

I really don’t care much about the demise or lack of demise of the Republican Party. I do care about the next three SCOTUS justices. We know who Obama will nominate. Any Republican will do better, including Romney at his worst.

[Sirius Lee]

Any Republican will do better, including Romney at his worst.

mitt's actions of nominating radical counter-constitutionalists shows otherwise. Those are the facts.

[DanZ]

Bush II gave use Roberts. Any other bright ideas ?

[OneWingedShark]

I really don’t care much about the demise or lack of demise of the Republican Party. I do care about the next three SCOTUS justices. We know who Obama will nominate. Any Republican will do better, including Romney at his worst.

I very much disagree with this sort of reasoning. It is exactly the same as the "any Democrat is better than any Republican" line I've heard elsewhere.
Furthermore, it supposes that Romney will nominate people who are substantially different than the sort Obama will; they are both socialists, both statists, therefore it is absurd to think that one would choose to nominate a person of an inherently different caliber than the other. Furthermore, it utterly discounts that w/o the senate's approval the nomination is useless; that is, if we had a strong senate even the worst of Presidents could not put a bad justice on the Supreme Court.

[af_vet_rr]

We know who Obama will nominate. Any Republican will do better, including Romney at his worst.

I'm sure people were thinking that with Chief Justice Roberts. Romney's nomination record is not something to support. We're going to get screwed by either the democrats or the Republicans, it's just a matter of how bad.