I wonder, if the lifeguard had stayed at his post, and the man had drowned, would the lifeguard, or his company, be sued successfully by (say) the man's family?I don't know, but if someone would have drowned in his area while he was saving the other guy, I guarantee his company would have been sued.
Still think he did the right thing, though.
Precisely. And therein lies the reason the lawyers required the restriction, and set up the moral dilemma for the lifeguard.