Read the next sentence. It says that a fraudulent SSN is a violation of both the Federal and State Constitutions, which would preclude FUBO from running again.
I guess we will see if there is a real judge in Ohio.
You are right, she does say this.
But it's a claim or contention, not a fact.
How exactly does a fraudulent SS#, in and of itself, render a candidate under the US Constitution? Which clause spells this out?
I think it far more likely the plaintiff believes it should make a candidate ineligible, and I might even agree with her. But I really doubt the US Constitution has anything at all to say about SS#s with regard to eligibility. In fact, the Constitution has nothing at all to say about whether convicted felons are eligible to be elected president.
Read the Constitution. The phrase "social security" does not appear any where in the United States or Ohio Constitution and a valid social security card is not a constitutional requirment to run for POTUS.
Where does the Constitution mention SSNs? LOL!
He can be a total fraud and still run and be elected perfectly legally. We saw it happen in 2008. If we waste our time chasing down rabbit holes, it just might happen again next November.