To: Repeal The 17th
Call it semantics if you want, but it's not a tax credit, its a tax penalty.
In the examples you gave, I don't have to pay the government for not having kids, or a mortgage etc.
If I do have kids, mortgage etc, I get my tax liability reduced via the tax credit.
If I do not to have health insurance, then my tax liability goes up via the tax penalty.
I call that not the same thing.
23 posted on
07/05/2012 4:08:46 PM PDT by
skully
(06/28/2012 : The banner no longer yet waves....Gadsden DTOM)
To: skully
“...If I do not to have health insurance, then my tax liability goes up via the tax penalty.
I call that not the same thing...”
-
You dont have kids? Your tax liability goes up...
You dont have a mortgage? Your tax liability goes up...
You dont give to charity? Your tax liability goes up...
You dont contribute to a 401K plan? Your tax liability goes up...
You didnt put in a new high efficiency air conditioner? Your tax liability goes up...
You didnt buy an alternative fuel vehicle? Your tax liability goes up...
You dont have health insurance? Your tax liability goes up...
Same damn thing.
26 posted on
07/05/2012 4:30:25 PM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson