Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
***Rehashing. Those scenarios were covered more than a year ago.

Yes. And since he apparently didn't let anyone test his "coolant" there is still no proof it was only water.

105 posted on 07/11/2012 5:28:43 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot

Yes. And since he apparently didn’t let anyone test his “coolant” there is still no proof it was only water.
***Exactly what ‘coolant replacement’ could account for the levels of energy reported? If this is a chemical reaction, then all the better, because the NRC would not be involved.


109 posted on 07/11/2012 8:53:25 AM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson