NO! For the THOUSANDTH TIME NO! It is NOT strange that there are no pregnant pictures of Stanley Ann. My Mother had 5 children, and there are NO pictures of her pregnant. My Sister had two, there are NO pictures of her Pregnant. Another sister had three. There are NO pictures of her pregnant. My other sister had two. There are NO pictures of her pregnant. *I* have four children. THERE ARE NO PICTURES OF MY WIFE PREGNANT.
Stop! Just Stop reading significance into this trivial piece of information. There yet remain pictures from the Dunham family that have not been seen by the public. For all we know they may contain a picture of a pregnant Stanley Ann, but it makes not a D@mn bit of difference if they do or if they don't. The fact is NOT SIGNIFICANT!!!!!!
Well the reason i say that is because she flew to chicago 2 days after giving birth? thats strange to me. ( atleast i think it was chicago)- this big balony story dont add up for ann.. it would make sence if they were 1/2 brother and sister.. she probally adopted him from a afican woman that stanley armour dunham was banging
NO! For the THOUSANDTH TIME NO! It is NOT strange that there are no pregnant pictures of Stanley Ann. My Mother had 5 children, and there are NO pictures of her pregnant. My Sister had two, there are NO pictures of her Pregnant. Another sister had three. There are NO pictures of her pregnant. My other sister had two. There are NO pictures of her pregnant. *I* have four children. THERE ARE NO PICTURES OF MY WIFE PREGNANT.
Stop! Just Stop reading significance into this trivial piece of information. There yet remain pictures from the Dunham family that have not been seen by the public. For all we know they may contain a picture of a pregnant Stanley Ann, but it makes not a D@mn bit of difference if they do or if they don’t. The fact is NOT SIGNIFICANT!!!!!!