Posted on 07/09/2012 9:51:16 AM PDT by chessplayer
Certain events in the 2012 campaign make you ask how would the media respond if a particular story was about Mitt Romney rather than President Obama. Take this past Friday, when President Obama was introduced at an Ohio rally by a man accused to stealing trade secrets from his former employer.
According to a local CBS affiliate in Cleveland, Ohio, Daniel Potkanowicz has been ordered to pay $500,000 to his former employer after a judge ruled that Potkanowicz had stolen trade secrets.
Obama is running a very, very sloppy campaign this time around. You pay people to catch things like this before they happen. His handlers did not even bother to check Barry’s autobiography before launching a dog attack on Romney.
They can afford to be sloppy.
No one in the MSM will EVER report on their mistakes. That’s why Obama isn’t afraid to get up and tell bare-face lies at his campaign stops.
Balanced coverage has gone the way of the dodo bird.
He's no longer simply "accused" of the crime. He may be appealing the ruling, but it has been adjudicated in a court of law.
Devil Patrick?
Sounds perfectly qualified to be a RAT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.