Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh: Romney Must Get Tougher on Obama
Rush Limbaugh Show ^ | Monday July 9, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 07/09/2012 12:37:59 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: rem_mitchell
So where were they during the primary when they could have made a difference?

Voting against Romney and for five or six different candidates, all of which were outspent and assaulted with negative ads by the Romney slime machine.

Were you in hibernation when all that was going on?

61 posted on 07/10/2012 11:39:13 AM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

“Voting against Romney and for five or six different candidates....”
________

Exactly the problem. There was no leadership during the primary, just random ambling. Conservative media figures were all trying so hard not to upset audience share that not one single figure came out for a candidate. I don’t think that I or any other Freeper would have ceded their vote to a media figure, but the discussion could have brought about real debate and a conservative candidate. had just one stepped forward and said, “I back______ because”, then a discussion would have ensued. What happened was mud slinging, lying, attacking each other and the cnaiddate who could afford the most mud and TV ads won.


62 posted on 07/10/2012 3:46:12 PM PDT by rem_mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

” Liberal Republicans like George Romney and Nelson Rockefeller.”

Yes, and those liberal Republicans are the very ones that Rush and Hannity are actually gushing over when they brag about the GOP passing the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Goldwater voted against it.

Not that I expect that they know the slightest thing about the nature of the GOP back then. It’s just more of their perennial cheerleading for anything that the GOP has done, ignoring the fact that The Stupid Party has often advanced the interests of the Left. That’s why they are the Stupid Party.


63 posted on 07/10/2012 9:41:26 PM PDT by Pelham (John Roberts: the cherry on top of judicial tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

“He doesn’t need a fire-breather, just someone who isn’t ‘moderate’ - and bland ( e.g. Pawlenty). Or Portman.


64 posted on 07/11/2012 10:19:57 PM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

He will not do that. He handlers won’t let him.


65 posted on 07/12/2012 3:11:04 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

“I hope he has people that will advise him...but from what I’ve seen...they are inept. If he can’t manage his own campaign..”

I SO don’t get it! When he ended up last man standing, I thought well, at least he has an incredibly skilled, efficient and killer campaign, to have knocked all the others out of the race, that will have a fighting chance against BHO.

NOW they have him being Mr. Nice Guy, lame and weak?

There’s such an obvious contrast here that it does make one believe he’s part of a New World Order plan to let BHO win again. (We already know both BHO and Hillary attended the ‘08 Bilderberg conference.)

Even my 93-year-old dad says we have the worst possible candidate (he didn’t like McLame in ‘08 either). It just makes me sick to see all this unfolding. A conservative friend of mine and his dad talk about going to Australia to live because they don’t want to be here when our country goes down the tubes, and because Australia doesn’t worry about political correctness, has tough rules on immigration and values their sovereignty.


66 posted on 07/12/2012 6:11:08 PM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson